Emcopy Download Link

A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration • Community members shall conduct themselves with professionalism. • Do not expressly advertise your product. More details on the may be found. For IT career related questions, please visit Please check out our, which includes lists of subreddits, webpages, books, and other articles of interest that every sysadmin should read!

Checkout the Users are encouraged to contribute to and grow our Wiki. So you want to be a sysadmin?

Official IRC Channel - #reddit-sysadmin on Official Discord - •. First off, I love RoboCopy, I've used it for over a decade now, and I have no issues with it.

However, I've gotten to the point where RoboCopy is just not fast enough. What I have found on a long quest of trial and error is a utility called 'EMCopy' from EMC. It is a free data migration tool, CLI only, and has a lot of features that just seem to work better than RoboCopy. I'll just give you a few quick points of what works better with EMCopy. • Multithreading: EMCopy supports up to 256 threads.

RoboCopy does support 128 threads on new versions of Windows 2008R2 and above. Comparing EMCopy to RoboCopy with the same number of threads, EMCopy is 25-35% faster. There are down sides to multithreading though, e.g. Copying a lot of larger files can benefit from fewer threads. Empire Earth 1 Crack No Cd Italian there. For smaller files it works better to have more threads, but it's important that the utility pre-allocates the files, to reduce fragmentation. • Performing Backups or Mirror Directories: EMCopy doesn't have a '/MIR' command, however you can use two commands that will only copy files that are newer on the source, and also to delete files that no longer exist on source. Nec Dvd Rw Nd 3550a Driver Windows Xp on this page. Overall, EMCopy screams at doing a backup or mirroring a directory, because of the way it traverses the folders, which is in a non-linear manner.

EMCopy – The Robocopy Replacement. Posted by sk3tch on May 18, 2015 – 7:56 PM. Had issues with Robocopy – found that EMCopy is a better choice. Download it here. MD5 checksum: c5e480a84e6dd7d8d3b2f2186a549d0c. CifsTools_7.1.72.1.zip [8.46 MB]. This post is under “CPU, General, Storage” and has. May 12, 2013 Download Beyond Compare link. File-Based Migration using EMCopy; NetApp SnapVault - 'The Data archiving solution' NetApp Cluster-mode networking deep dive!

• Copies NTFS Permissions / Auditing Information / Owner Information: EMCopy and RoboCopy will both do this, but again, EMCopy just mops the floor with RoboCopy when running it side by side. Here is a test I did, just for this post, EMCopy vs. Let me state that should not be a bench mark, many factors can change the outcome of these tests, but I ran the tests on the same system, and with the same processes running both times. RoboCopy: Started: Wed Oct 07 09: Source: G: APPS testapp Dest: T: TEST Files: *.* Options: *.* /S /E /COPY:DATS /PURGE /MIR /Z /MT:128 /R:1 /W:1 Total Copied Skipped Mismatch FAILED Extras Dirs: 2553 2552 1 0 0 0 Files: 5 0 0 0 0 Bytes: 30.482 g 30.482 g 0 0 0 0 Times: 0:15:46 0:15:46 0:00:00 0:00:08 EMCopy: Date: 10:36:39 Source path: G: APPS testapp Desti.

Not sure why you are being down voted. It is even mentioned here: robocopy /z adds a lot of overhead and designed for poor connections because it adds a file marker to the file on the remote side. Removing /z speeds up robocopy significantly on good connections. 30GB in 15 or 9 minutes generally indicates LAN or Disk to Disk so /z is unnecessary. EMCopy seems to maybe 10% faster but the newer versions of Robocopy are pretty close. Also the newer versions can be shoved on to older OS's if you want.

EMCopy - A Robocopy Replacement Thursday, December 18 2014 We have a mix of Git, Ant and Robocopy scripts for deployments at work. I've been working on moving everything into Jenkins. We have a few projects that have a LOT of files. And I quickly ran into an issue using Robocopy to move them to the server took forever. Doing some research I found a few things. Newer versions of Robocopy support a 'thread' option. This can dramatically speed up copying, but.

It's only supported on newer servers (2008+). Testing copies to my local workstation (Win7) were really quick but when I copied the same files to a Windows 2003 server things were much slower. The next thing I ran into was Robocopy's total failure on doing differential copies. I was expecting rsync and got a slightly beefier Xcopy instead. Despite trying all sorts of flag options I could never get Robocopy to just copy files that had changed. Robocopy seems stuck to the date last modified of the file and while it appears it also checks for file differences the date always wins. So I went looking for an alternative.

I stumbled upon a few posts that mentioned Emcopy, a tool created by EMC. The license is a bit vague but a few quick searches and I was able to find a copy. The syntax is exactly like Robocopy. Emcopy.exe source path destination path /de /nosec /s /xd images /th 16 /r:3 /w:30 • /de - this compares date AND file differences • /nosec - emcopy can copy permission but this flag ignores all that • /s - copies subdirectories/files • /xd - exclude directories • /th - threading • /r:5 - will retry X times if it encounters an error • /w:30 - how long it waits between retries Doing some benchmarks I didn't see a huge increase in speed over Robocopy during the initial copy when the destination directory was empty. Where Emcopy stood out was in subsequent copies. [emcopy] File(s) copied: 1 [emcopy] Amount of copied byte(s): 188 Byte(s) (188 Byte(s)) [emcopy] Estimated copy bitrate: 0.015 KB/s [emcopy] Global copy duration: 11.865 [emcopy] [emcopy] Elapsed time: secs: 12 Where Robocopy would have copied all the files over again, Emcopy simply copied the one file I updated.

Again I'm not sure of the license of Emcopy but if you search you can find several posts on how to get it and it is easily found. The download includes 32 and 64 bit files and a well documented README file and of course there is help available at the command line. I still want to look at some other options but so far Emcopy seems very promising.